The jury finally reached its verdict in the Oracle v. Google trial, but failed to reach an agreement on one of the most important elements of Oracle’s claim. The jury could not agree on the issue of whether Google’s use of the Java code constituted fair use in the infringement case.

Interestingly enough, Judge Alsup advised the sides “that there is “zero finding of copyright liability” without a fair-use verdict,” essentially cutting Oracle’s claim for damages to mere hundreds of thousands, rather than hundreds of millions. According to Bloomberg, Judge Alsup isn’t likely to consider and rule on the issue of fair use, since “there are arguments that go both ways on that.” Uh oh for Oracle.

Google is still waiting for one more victory, since Judge Alsup hasn’t ruled on the issue of whether Java technology (code) is copyrightable. This could be a second nail in Oracle’s coffin, which would relieve Google of any liability.

Jeff Taylor

I'm just an ordinary guy living an extraordinary life. I'm also an attorney and I blog about Android for lawyers. You can follow me on Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, or Google+.


Weekly News Round-up: What You May Have Missed in the World of Android | The Droid Lawyer™ · June 22, 2012 at 3:26 am

[…] enough, in the Oracle v. Google trial, Judge Allsup also ruled that Oracle’s owed nothing for any of Google’s infringement. […]

The Droid Lawyer™ | Apple Scores Victory Against Samsung in the Patent Wars · September 4, 2012 at 6:39 am

[…] s.parentNode.insertBefore(po, s); })(); With Oracle’s loss (and here) in the Oracle v. Google debacle, and Apple’s loss in Apple v. Motorola […]

The Droid Lawyer™ | Oracle Appeals · February 13, 2013 at 4:25 pm

[…] an interesting bit of news, Oracle submitted its brief in the Oracle v. Google appeal. Groklaw has the full coverage, but in essence, this brief is 89 mind-numbing pages of […]

Let's discuss this (you can use Markdown in your comment)

%d bloggers like this: